Eth-125 Week 9 Final Prject

Singular Final Project: Kristopher Freitag Race and ethnicity and understanding its disparities helped me accomplish a specific measure of levity with the manner in which I collaborate with others. America is amazingly various, yet share a bounty of things for all intents and purpose. This is appeared since forever and directly outside our entryways, America, where our towns and urban communities are filled to the edge with characters and of contrast race and ethnicity share this culture we call American society.I have figured out how to put a take to being short sited and keeping in mind that I found out minimal about my own social history, the most significant thing is to guarantee you don't disregard it. Such a large number of individuals have prejudged thoughts and are set in their own social history and perspectives, yet once one investigates it, there are tremendously more things one has not understood and learned. It's difficult to think going in to the class that you would be so innocent and oblivious to acknowledge that we are so near each other, and how our battles of contrasts have brought us closer together.For myself a Caucasian male, there is little to find out about my ethnicity, anyway as my better half is Hispanic we have developed nearer as I have gained more from her and her â€Å"peeps† as she calls them, than most will ever figure it out. Finding out about your own social can be valuable, anyway I see more advantage in knowing another's, this thus shows a degree of regard for their own history and not a total ignore of any different backgrounds they may have originated from. The patterns in migration in the United States are truly unsurprising and keep on developing exponentially.Immigration development is relied upon to stay high inside the United States, as individuals love this nation of our own, and will keep on moving here as a result of its qualities and generally significant of all, its opportunity. Truly, America isn't great, however it is viewed as the motherland and I don't believe that notoriety is leaving soon. Individuals must get ready for the proceeding with development of movement by incorporating language, culture, and other little contrasts into our general public. This is remembered for our schools, organizations, TV, papers, and other outlets.For model, there ought to be language interpretations on transport stop signs or eatery menus, and so on. The high note of this trade of culture will be the constrained about of bias one can guarantee against â€Å"the white man† as generally will turn into the minorities. Amusingly, I consider this to be something to be thankful for, America was established on workers, I see an a balance of offer the most convincing thought. Having the opportunity to picked your own way and religion in the United States is the reason we are the quickest developing country, it is time we grasped our disparities and permit them to make another life for us.The chal lenge the United States faces in light of its decent variety are ever changing and regularly developing clashes inside its own one of a kind outskirts. We as a whole need something to upgrade lives, some better compensation, some more opportunity, legitimization, marriage, the decent variety of the things we battle for are tremendous all by themselves. As we push ahead we should start to haggle with these contention and make a serene goals accessible to the individuals and their requests, else we will dive ourselves down into a common war, of which I am not intrigued in.The amusing side of this, is in the event that we as a general public, as a nation, as one can stand up and state this will occur and this is the manner by which it will be, than we may very well bind together our disparities and licenses the original of Americans to be naturally introduced to a nation where we cooperate, not against each other. The diverse social foundations coordinated into one network, the various encounters we may gain from one another, the conceivable outcomes are unfathomable, however on the off chance that we contrast our general public with those of old, the extension of war presented new societies and information, for what reason would we be able to do likewise without the ar.By essentially being polite and open minded and conscious to each other and rewarding each other as we would need to be dealt with. I think impoliteness is at unsurpassed high. I am perusing a book The Civility Solution ; it has a lot of prevalent information. I think in the event that we instruct ourselves regarding this matter ; share what we are realizing it will spread rapidly. I was in a café tonight ; my server was at the table close to mine ; I heard her utilization the word CRAP. I couldn't conviction she said that, she did. What might make an individual state that when she is conversing with individuals about food. So raising cognizance is the best approach to go.I think experience is si gnificant and when individuals gain for a fact it is the best educator. Numerous who live out of sight from others are moving in to the more populated zones and that will help. At the point when you need assistance and the individual who aides isn't in the body or from the topographical region you love you begin adoring them at any rate. Definitely media generalizations are regularly used so as to accommodate a particular impact, particularly in the diversion, promoting, and news ventures, which need a wide window ornament to draw in as huge a group of people as conceivable to rapidly decipher information.Stereotypes extended in the media can have adverse reaction and gotten hazardous. They can decrease the tremendous scope of social contrasts in individuals to excessively oversimplified classifications and changing suspicions about specific gatherings into â€Å"realities† are locked in to legitimize the situation of those in control and sustain social bias and disparity The social gatherings being generalized are not allowed any chance to impact how they are represented.This is normal inside the media, paying little mind to style, show or channel, generalizations and a few reasons for cliché depictions, incorporate an absence of decent variety off camera. Anyway the reason for this formation of gratefulness prompted by the media isn't without saying, the center focused on minorities all things considered, families, and the thankfulness for opportunity, this absence of outrage that can be driven into our TVs, motion pictures, and ads is a strategy for joining Americans and their differences.Only through an affirmation of our disparities will the biased learning's and instructive administrations be made the falsehood to be straightforwardly talked about and drawn closer with in a manner which is probably going to encourage change. It is clear notwithstanding, that in the event that we can't discuss these distinctions and issues in their depiction, we d efinitely can't transform it. Sigmund Freud, the renowned Austrian doctor changed the entire essence of brain science in such an emotional path by advancing a hypothesis of character that worried on the significance of the oblivious mind.The work he finished with patients experiencing mental handicaps like panic drove him to hypothesize that our youth just as our oblivious considerations and activities contribute toward the advancement of our characters and by and large grown-up conduct. Changing a whole gatherings biased perspectives, perspectives and convictions and a foundation's bigot activities isn't just fixed overnight.Reducing our racial partiality as a general public and prejudice is an unpredictable assignment that adjustments in thoughts from network to network, so it doesn't offer a straight-forward methodology, a bit by bit process that can be received and coordinated without having a total comprehension of nature and social setting. This activity would require realizin g your locale well and having the option to pick a technique that will best meet your own locale's requirements, history, setting, energies, and assets, as a one size fits all won't work in this issue.

A Look At Issue Of Homosexuality Religion Essay

A Look At Issue Of Homosexuality Religion Essay The reaction of the congregation to the issue of homosexuality is hazardous; it is so in light of the fact that homosexuality presently has gotten so obvious and prominent. It is stunning how individuals are moving into the open as being gay and how it is being talked about transparently and even gets compassion from certain quarters in the congregation. The undeniable certainty is that it can never again be disregarded. In this paper I will talk about how the congregation in Africa ought to react to this issue. Examination OF CONTROVERSY Homosexuality is a lawful offense in most African nations, despite the fact that as of late there are endeavors to sanction it in certain nations, however it is legitimate in most American states. This is the reason it is a contention to the Anglican Communion which is around the world. The meaning of homosexuality as per Woods Jr (1968, p.135) â€Å"the word gay can be utilized to allude to different unobtrusive degrees of suggestive fascination o r contribution between individuals from the equivalent sex.† The moralist would excuse moral complaints on homosexuality basing on characteristic law, which they state normal law expect that the structure of male and female private parts decide their capacity explicitly. The early church likewise scrutinized same sex rehearses, for instance Gagnon (2001,p.163) puts it very well that † Jews, similar to Greek and Roman pundits of Homosexuality, dismissed it on the ground that it was against nature, that is separated from the way that the law precluded same-sex intercourse.† He says there are four reasons why just intercourse among male and female was viewed as per nature. The principal he says is that there is no reproduction in Homosexual intercourse and the subsequent explanation is that it is an attack against how God planned the male and female organs. The third explanation is that there is no characteristic suggestive enthusiasm in Homosexual sex says Gagnon and the last he says is that not even creatures practice Homosexual intercourse. Be that as it may, a few researchers would contend that separated from proliferation purposes, sex serves various capacities. As indicated by Woods Jr. (1968) â€Å"the judgment that sex is just for multiplication is as restricted to an agrarian, low-populace economy as the judgment that pearl are significant is to a buyer economy.† The Lambeth meeting goals number 1.10 of 1998 states that considering the educating of sacred text, that marriage ought to be between a man and a lady in a long lasting association, it perceived that there were people who experienced themselves as having a gay direction. A portion of these individuals are church individuals and hence need peaceful consideration, moral heading and God’s changing force. The goals was to tune in to the experience of the gay people and guarantee them that God cherishes them. Despite the fact that they required the service of the peace ful consideration to all independent of sexual direction, the goals didn't inform the legitimizing or gift with respect to a similar sex association nor appointing those in same sex association. Some would contend that in the Bible it isn't clear what they implied by homosexuality. For instance Bishop David Russell in his leaf let (page 3) composed that the Biblical scholars never under any circumstance thought about the sort of gay that we are mulling over today, the Partnerships we are looking to have confirmed presently. I don't concur with him and other people who think in these lines on the grounds that the Bible is exceptionally clear on homosexuality. In Leviticus 20 :13, it is certain that a man who has sexual relations with another man, both ought to be killed in light of the fact that they have done awful thing. The other content, which censures homosexuality in the New Testament, is Romans 1:26-27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10. it is in this way exceptionally certain that homo sexuality is censured in the Bible. On the off chance that the gay of the Bible (Leviticus 20:13) is same as the gay of today, at that point homosexuality is an antiquated type of sexual depravity.

Dont Quit!

Dont Quit! When things go wrong, as they sometimes will, when the road you’re trudging seems all uphill, When the funds are low and the debts are high, And you want to smile, but you have to sigh, When care is pressing you down a bit, Rest, if you must, but do not quit.Life is queer with its twists and turns, As every one of us sometimes learns, And many a failure turns about, When he might have won had he stuck it out; Don’t give up though the pace seems slowâ€" You may succeed with another blow.Often the goal is nearer than, It seems to a faint and faltering man, Often the struggler has given up, When he might have captured the victor’s cup, And he learned too late when the night slipped down, How close he was to the golden crown. Success is failure turned inside outâ€" The silver tint of the clouds of doubt, And you never can tell how close you are, It may be near when it seems so far, So stick to the fight when you’re hardest hitâ€" It’s when things seem worst that you must not q uit.

Universal Healthcare Is Not a Priviledge, It is a Right

Teri Reynolds once said that â€Å"It is hard to talk about a middle ground for something that is a fundamental right.† This country has no reason to compromise something that is in the U.S. Constitution and that was meant to be available for all U.S. citizens. Universal Healthcare is not a privilege; it is a right. â€Å"In the second half of the 19th century, advances in biology and chemistry helped medical doctors better understand the human body, incorporating principles of modern science into the practice of medicine. Sanitation prevented infection, more effective treatments for diseases and injuries were developed, and surgical techniques were refined.† (Shultz and Shoven). Doctors and scientists worked hard to develop certain skills for which the citizens of the U.S. could be more cared for. â€Å"Medical schools did not exist at this time, and medical training largely consisted of working as an apprentice to an existing practitioner. People who got sick genera lly paid out of pocket for their medical treatments, but costs were quite low, perhaps because results were often negative.† (Shultz and Shoven). In all the research that the doctors and scientists had done, there came trial and error. As this was a concern for peoples’ well-being, healthcare services should have been free as it should be now. â€Å"In 1847 the American Medical Association (AMA) was founded to create professional standards for doctors and set minimum educational requirements. Medical colleges were established,

Analysis Of Terrence Malick s Days Of Heaven And Badlands

Against a subdued landscape of blushing scarlet skies, rolling countryside hills, and endless terrains of natural Earth, Terrence Malick constructs his divine cinematic world. Malick’s films, Days of Heaven and Badlands both contain the element of paradise lost, making almost every scene reminiscent of an Eden-esque time and place before the heavenly garden was on the cusp of ruin. This recurring element indicates that Malick is an Auteur, a filmmaker whose original directing style can be reflected in each of his works as an artistic stamp (Boda). This stamp can take the form of a common motif, a common setting, or a common set of actors. For Malick’s films, several of these mutual components exist. Terrence Malick demonstrates the Auteur†¦show more content†¦Terrence Malick’s distinct emphasis on setting provides for this reserved subplot within the central synopsis of his films allowing it to serve as a â€Å"silent character† with the capacity to develop and progress the storyline. Furthermore, this emphasis establishes setting as one of the most chief elements of a Terrence Malick film, as demonstrated again in his later film, Days of Heaven. Complementary to Badlands, Malick’s Days of Heaven takes place in the prairielands of Texas with endless fields of grain and Earth. Protagonists, Bill and Abby find themselves on the run from civilization into the wild, as Kit and Holly had. Once again, the audience finds itself overwhelmed by the Eden-esque setting of the film. Malick uses this setting to demonstrate the preeminence that the natural world holds over civilization spiritually (Angelson). Its beauty and quietude along with the steady or still camera shots provide this consistent sense of a perishing almost-paradise in need of salvation. Through his choice of setting, Malick creates a visual Eden for the public eye to feast upon, while it serves as a voiceless character in his many works. A remarkably unique ele ment of all Terrence Malick’s films is the lack of artificial lighting usage. Rather than rely on equipment, Malick utilizes muted, natural sunlight during a period of time referred to as â€Å"magic hour†, the twilight hours before sunrise and after sunset, to illuminate his shots (Hopwood). The

Star Studies and the Mass Culture Debates Free Essays

string(50) " spectator and the Hollywood stars she discusses\." Star Studies and the Mass Culture Debates Since the dawn of time, society has always had its own stars that multitudes of people look up to as idols. Today, most of the stars that people flock to are famous people within the entertainment business, most notably actors and actresses. Movie stars have been consumed by the public’s eye ever since the film industry took off in the early 1900s. We will write a custom essay sample on Star Studies and the Mass Culture Debates or any similar topic only for you Order Now There are certain movie stars that transcend time, and lately, people do whatever they can to find out as much as they can of these stars to reveal who they truly are outside of being in front of a camera. However, some critics of the Mass Culture Debates do find holes in the star system we have today. The critics feel as if the culture of these stars are becoming very standardized, which is greatly affecting the culture of people watching them. To demonstrate my point, I will be discussing how Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer oppose the arguments made about star figures in Richard Dyer’s essay, â€Å"Living Stars. † I will also explain how Dwight MacDonald takes a very similar stance against Jackie Stacy’s â€Å"Feminine Fascinations: Forms of Identification in Star-Audience Relations. Finally, I will finish off by explain how critic David Riseman seeks to mediate the Mass Culture critics’ arguments and take the side of Dyer and Stacy. If Adorno and Horkheimer were to read Richard Dyer’s â€Å"Living Stars† and dissect it, they would feel that movie stars today aren’t original in that they use a very scripted formula to attract themse lves to the masses, which is why they become popular in the first place. Throughout his essay, Dyer explains that star figures are representations, like myths, who serve to resolve many of society’s vital binary oppositions. He goes on to explain this point by saying, â€Å"The private self is further represented through a set of oppositions that stem from the division of the world into private and public spaces, a way of organizing space that in turn relates to the idea of the separability of the individual and society. † (FSR 130) His primary opposition for which he discusses stars and their relationship to the public eye is stars portraying their private selves versus their public serves. Public stars control themselves on screen, and maintain great poise and try not to display their emotions to readily, because they want to keep a ophisticated image of themselves; whereas private stars are much more intense and introverted, they aren’t afraid to express their emotions and show who they truly are behind close doors. Martin Scorsese’s film The Aviator serves to depict the private and public image of real life filmmaker and aviation pioneer Howard Hughes. To the public, Hughes becam e a larger than life star in directing Hell’s Angels and purchasing a major airline of the time. However, his mental health soon began to crumble when his Obsessive Compulsive Disorder began affecting both private and public facets of his life. Eventually, Hughes comes a point where he locks himself in his house and slips into a deep depression. As a result of Hughes manic behavior, Adorno and Horkheimer would believe that if Hughes’ private behavior were to ever leak out into the public spectrum, his image would be forever tarnished because the Howard Hughes behind closed doors is not the same man who became a superstar director. One of the primary arguments Adorno and Horkheimer have with mass culture is that they feel that culture itself is becoming too standardized based upon formulas to streamline mass reproduction. When profitable, these formulas can become reproducible, like the star system of today. â€Å"Not only are the hit songs, stars, and soap operas cyclically recurrent and rigidly invariable types, but the specific content of the entertainment itself is derived from them and only appears in change. † (FSR 9) It is as if they feel like nothing is original anymore and that everything is scripted and painted with this formula that works for the system to get the masses interested in a particular artist, song, show, movie, or in Dyer’s case, a movie star. Take for example Bette Davis, who in her films displays a very mannered style and grace under pressure. She usually plays very strong, independent, manipulative characters who have a solid surface disguised by an internal inferno. So when someone may want to see the latest Bette Davis movie, they may not like it if she plays in the style of a goodie goodie housewife just like all the typical housewives seen in such 1950s sitcoms as Father Knows Best and Leave It To Beaver. People are going to want to have her display some internal conflict she is constantly struggling with but in the end, over powers it because of her strong will and female empowerment. This same principle goes for Howard Hughes and his image. People want to see the Howard Hughes that is a public sensation, a brilliant filmmaker, a man with a taste for beautiful women. Nobody wants to see him in a depressed state locking himself in his house, because that will deter people’s images of him and less people will go out to see his movies. This plays into Adorno and Horkheimer’s idea of these formulas becoming reproducible and how this type of consumerism the individual plays can create the illusion of individual identity and authentic community. They feel like stars like David and Hughes have become statistics based on their genres they play best rather than recognized as individuals with creative freedom over their work. Just as Adorno and Horkheimer would have a problem with Richard Dyer’s essay, Dwight MacDonald has many of the same qualms with Jackie Stacey’s views of seeing movie stars as idols we should strive to be someday. In her essay, â€Å"Feminine Fascinations: Forms of Identification in Star-Audience Relations,† Stacey analyzes the relationship between the female spectator and the Hollywood stars she discusses. You read "Star Studies and the Mass Culture Debates" in category "Papers" In her discussion of imitating and copying the female stars, the female spectators often try to emulate either the stars looks or personas to try and be just like them, and in turn want others to think they are just like the star. Stacey explains that, â€Å"Stars are thus identified with particular commodities which are part of the reproduction of feminine identities. The female spectators in these examples produce particular images of femininity which remind them of their favorite stars. In so doing they produce a new feminine identity, one which combines an aspect of the star with their own appearance. † (FSR 153) It seems that Stacey is pointing out that these particular stars are consumable feminine images which female spectators then reproduce through other forms of consumption. Not only do these stars try to solve the binary oppositions of private self and public self as Dyer mentions, they are meant to be consumed by an audience as role models. Both seem to agree on the fact that stars fill some voids in people’s lives. We try to see ourselves as these very public figures and emulate every facet of their lives to try and improve our lives as a whole. Dyer’s and Stacey’s arguments also share many direct correlations with David Buxton’s article, â€Å"Rock Music, The Star System, And The Rise Of Consumerism. † In it, Buxton talks about how rock stars are being consumed by youth culture everywhere in that the youth are trying to replicate the stars’ styles and attitudes. He explains that, â€Å"The presentation of the life-style of the stars as the ideal of sophisticated modern living grew as part of the American Dream. † (OR 432) This proves that the idolization of stars is not a new concept that was originally thought up of by any of these three writers. Dwight MacDonald, however, does have a problem with the standardization of this process and how our culture is heading in the wrong direction as a result of this. Dwight MacDonald wrote an essay entitled, â€Å"A Theory of Mass Culture,† in which he explains that elements of mass culture and high culture are starting to merge and become standardized. MacDonald uses the merging of Broadway and the movies as an example of this by saying, â€Å"The theatre was High Culture, mostly of the Academic variety†¦ The movies were definitely Mass Culture, mostly very bad†¦ With the sound film, Broadway and Hollywood drew closer together. Plays are now produced mainly to sell the movie rights, with many being directly financed by the film companies. (FSR 15) One specific example of this can be found in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. Though the themes of Shakespeare’s story are still in the movie version, Luhrmann blends high art and folk art to make a midcult style movie by placing the setting in present day South Central Los Angeles. MacDonald fears this type of media renders people passive by the end, and is one o f the greatest threats to high culture. In MacDonald’s opinion, as our lives become inundated with midcult such as Romeo and Juliet, the reality of consumerism becomes naturalized. In essence, the heroes and heroines of masscult and midcult that MacDonald speaks of become idols of consumption, mainly movie stars. Stacey explains how female stars such as Bette Davis and Joan Crawford are meant to be consumed by the public because those are the actresses that women most frequently hear about, and want to live just like them because they are classy ladies who are real role models of how one woman should act in society. Based on MacDonald’s argument, the branding and consuming of stars oday represents a demise in our society’s high culture in that these shouldn’t be the people we should be idolizing. The real people that should be getting the praise are the people who changed our country to make life better for everyone in the end, like Thomas Edison and Benjamin Franklin. Using stars to fill the voids in our lives to solve key oppositions to MacDonald are detrimental to our high culture, which is what we really need to be praising instead all of the new media and stars that’ve become mainstream, like Jersey Shore and Teen Mom. Even though the left wing critics could have many potential problems with the star system of the past and of today, liberal sociologist David Riseman does present some points that could easily counter Adorno, Horkheimer, and MacDonald’s arguments. Riseman insists that mass culture consists of multiple forms of response by audiences. He believes everyone reacts differently to different forms of media and that no one is the same. The formulas that the left wing critics think is ultimately destroying high culture do not exist in Riseman’s opinion. Even though some people may want certain stars to stick to their formula, some may like to see those artists branch out and explore new fields. The stars that people ultimately consume and strive to become are all different for each individual. Buxton, Dyer, and Stacey don’t say that people only idolize the stars that they talk about. Riseman also argues that audiences of high art want to find their own kitsch in what they consider high culture, just like mass culture audiences want to see their own kitsch in their forms of entertainment. OR 7) He seems to think that Adorno, Horkheimer, and MacDonald have their own ideas of what high culture needs to be, which in the end, becomes something that is copied and will soon generate the same response. For anything negative that the left wing critics might say towards Dyer and Stacey’s arguments, Riseman is there to back up there arguments to prove that their theories are valid after all. It is very apparent that the issue of the Mass Culture Debates has been around for quite some time. So much so, that you can readily apply them to many different aspects of life, including the star system in Hollywood. There always have been and always will be movie stars or musicians that we enjoy and like to go see because they are good at their craft. Dyer, Stacey, and Buxton are just like every other person out there who ca truly see the effect that stars can have on society and the crazy things that people will do to try and copy their methods. Whether or not the Star System is good or detrimental to mass culture like Adorno, Horkheimer, and MacDonald seem to believe, as long as stars continue to make the industry interesting, critics will continue to discuss their methods and an on-going will last for many generations to come. Bibliography Hollows, Joanne, Peter Hutchings, and Mark Jancovich. â€Å"Section One: Political Economy and Mass Culture Theory. † The Film Studies Reader. London: Arnold, 2000. 9. Print. Hollows, Joanne, Peter Hutchings, and Mark Jancovich. â€Å"Section One: Political Economy and Mass Culture Theory. † The Film Studies Reader. London: Arnold, 2000. 15. Print. Hollows, Joanne, Peter Hutchings, and Mark Jancovich. â€Å"Section Four: Star Studies. † The Film Studies Reader. London: Arnold, 2000. 130. Print. Hollows, Joanne, Peter Hutchings, and Mark Jancovich. â€Å"Section Four: Star Studies. † The Film Studies Reader. London: Arnold, 2000. 153. Print. Frith, Simon, and Andrew Goodwin. â€Å"Part One: Groundworks. † On Record: Rock, Pop, and the Written Word. New York: Pantheon, 1990. 7. Print. Frith, Simon, and Andrew Goodwin. â€Å"Part Seven: Reading The Stars. † On Record: Rock, Pop, and the Written Word. New York: Pantheon, 1990. 432. Print. How to cite Star Studies and the Mass Culture Debates, Papers

Strange Meeting Essay Example For Students

Strange Meeting Essay Question:Present a detailed commentary on the poem STRANGE MEETING by WilfredOwen. To include Explanation of the ideas expressed in the poem. Linkswith specific moments with other Owen poems. Discussion of how the poemworks in term of poetic technique. Answer:STRANGE MEETING is probably Owens most problematic poem. Its title comesfrom Shelleys The Revolt of Islam Gone forth whom no strange meetingdid befall. It was written in the spring or early summer of 1918, the yearhe died. It was based on an earlier poem Earths Wheels which I reproduceas Appendix I. The poem recounts a dramatic meeting in Hell between twosoldiers who had fought on opposing sides. No longer enemies they find itpossible to see beyond conflict and hatred in a shared awareness of thetruth untold and the need to proclaim that truth. As Owen said in hisfamous Preface, All a poet can do is warn. We will write a custom essay on Strange Meeting specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The poem is written in first person and hence we tend to assume that thefirst speaker is Owen, but Owens message is delivered by the secondspeaker. This has lead to a speculation that the second speaker is anapparition of the first. In the first verse the first speaker dies andfinds his way to Hell. Titanic wars imply not just this war, butconflicts throughout history on a gigantic scale. In the second verse the first speaker realises that he is in Hell afterseeing the dead bodies, which however were groaning under the burden oftheir suffering. He prods one, which gets up, recognises him and blesseshim. Piteous is a key word here, which connects to almost all his poetrythat, really is about the pity of war. The similarity of the dead in thispoem to the living or should one say dying in his other poems isintentional. Compare the living of Mental Cases -Thus their heads wearthis hilarious, hideous, Awful falseness of set-smiling corpses- to thedead of Strange Meeting By his dead smile I knew we stood in Hell. In the beginning of the third verse Owen compares Hell with war. There isno blood, no smoke, no noise in Hell but all these are there in war. Vividdescriptions of these are a hallmark of his poems. If you could hear, atevery jolt, the blood Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs fromDulce et Decorum Est What murk of air remained stank old, and sour Withfumes from whizz-bangs, from The Sentry . The first speaker addresses the second as strange friend. Much mysteryhas been attributed to this paradox, but to my mind he uses strange becausehe does not know the person and friend because from this point on they willshare a common destiny. In response to the first speakers statement thathere is no cause to mourn, the second replies that they have to mourn theyears of their life they spent fighting each other. Precious years in whichthey could have fulfilled their hopes and achieved their desires. Lines 17to 23 (After the wildest beauty in the world etc.) refer to Owens questfor beauty and truth which he believed he had inherited from Keats andShelley and which perhaps may have been the subject of his poetry had notit been for his experiences in the war which changed everything. So must Itempt that face to loose its lightning. Great gods, whose beauty is death,will laugh above, Who made his beauty lovelier than love. I shall be brightwith their unearthly brightening. from Storm. H e began to write about thepity of war; purely about the pity unpolluted with other emotions. Itbecame his mission to tell the truth untold, the real and monstrousnature of war, which became the subject of all his later poems. The untoldtruth negates the old lie that it is a sweet and seemly thing to die forones country. This is the subject of Dulce et Decorum Est. The poet saysthat in the future will accept a world shattered with war as the norm anddo nothing about the bloodshed and violence. A prediction that has cometrue with frightening accuracy. In the remaining part of the verse thepoet, through the second speaker, says what he as a poet wants to do andhence in general what poetry should do. He says that poetry has the courageand wisdom, the mystery and the mastery to heal and is not tainted by war. .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c , .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .postImageUrl , .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c , .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:hover , .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:visited , .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:active { border:0!important; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:active , .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u47445e684d83d4d94c6480b7438d096c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Computers and Biology EssayThe poet would have liked to bring this life-giving water from sweetwells and spread it without restraint. He would like to tell the world thetruth that war is not glory and honour but stark pain. In poems such asGreater Love and Anthem for the Doomed Youth the images of love and delightare transformed into images of death. These transformations are theexperience of his generation. Red lips are not so red As the red stoneskissed by the English dead Here Owen perhaps refers to his decision tofight rather than be a conscientious objector. This decision was takenbecause if Owen wanted to write about the pity of war, he needed toexperience that pity. And his writing about the pity would hopefully be abalm to the next generation. The poem ends with the enemy killed showing no hatred; no feeling ofvengeance for his killer imparting the message that mankind must seekreconciliation. The friend of this verse contrasts ironically with thefriend of Dulce et Decorum Est My friend, you would not tell with suchhigh zest The friend of Strange Meeting is a stranger whos views areOwens views whereas the friend of the latter poem is a known person(likely reference to fellow poets who glorify war) whos view Owendisagrees with. The study of the structure of a poem is known as prosody and comprisesmeter, rhyme, and verse. Structurally the poem comprises 44 lines of iambicpentameter with pararhymed couplets. I have come across different versestructures in the various places I located the poem one, three and fourverses. Since I referred to the version in the 12th Grade textbook, 19thand 20th Century Verse, I will stick to that. Lines 1 to 3 comprise thefirst verse, lines 4 to 10 the second, lines 11 to 39 the third and lines40 to 44 the fourth. As the ideas get more complicated, more philosophicalthe length of the verse increases. Though the bulk of the poem lies in thethird verse, it is the last verse which has the most impact and Owen hasintentionally saved it for the end. The second speaker has recognised thefirst as his killer in the beginning itself and could have revealed thisvital information immediately but does not do so. He launches into theundone years and truth untold and only after finishing what he has to say,he dramatically but softly reveals the relationship between the two I amthe enemy you killed, my friend. No wonder these words have been chosen toadorn the poets memorial in the grounds of Shrewsbury Abbey. The iambicpentameter which consists of five feet each having one unstressed and onestressed syllable, is the most common meter used in English literature. Thereason probably is that it is just the right length for a narration, nottoo short not too long. Shakespeare used it in his plays and Wordsworthused it in his Preludes and Excursions. In this poem too, it provides aneasy flow to the narration. Pararhyme, or half-rhyme as it is often called,is an imperfect rhyme in which the final and the preceding consonants ofthe last stressed syllable agree but the intervening vowel sound does not. Examples from the poem are world walled and years yours. Owenbrilliantly uses pararhymes as an instrument in imaging the discords whichwere his subject. Full rhymes tend to bring smoothness in flow of the poem,whereas half rhymes jar the flow a bit which goes well with the ugliness ofthe subject. Yesterday through me as you jabbed and killed. .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 , .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .postImageUrl , .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 , .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:hover , .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:visited , .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:active { border:0!important; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:active , .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04 .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u3971341d3b3ea67846f293ab954a9d04:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Multicultural Education EssayI parried, but my hands were loath and cold.